Acta Mechanica Slovaca 2013, 17(2):78-83 | DOI: 10.21496/ams.2013.023

Safety of Machinery - the Need for Risk Assessment and the Reasons why

Siegfried Radandt*
Forschungsgesellschaft fü angewandte Systemsicherheit und Arbeitsmedizin, Mannheim/BRD

Keywords: Risk management, risk assessment methods, risk estimation, risk evaluation, risk treatment, safety of technical systems, functional safety,protective measures, human factors

Published: October 31, 2013  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Radandt, S. (2013). Safety of Machinery - the Need for Risk Assessment and the Reasons why. Acta Mechanica Slovaca17(2), 78-83. doi: 10.21496/ams.2013.023
Download citation

References

  1. The DIRECTIVE 2006/42/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 17 May 2006 on machinery
  2. Siegfried RADANDT1, 2, Jianye SHI21Inherent Safety - A Concept for a Safe Process with a low Level of Danger even if Things Go wrong; Publication at Northeastern University Shenyang, China
  3. ISO/EN 12100 Safety of machinery - Basic concepts, general principles for design
  4. ISO/EN 14121 Safety of machinery - risk assessment
  5. S. Radandt; System Safety: A Science and Technology Primer; Presentation at NEU Shenyang, China
  6. Siegfried Radandt; Risiken in der Industrie, Sicherheit, Vorsorge, Meidung in der Technik,, Publication in FSA Proceedings
  7. Bischoff;Risks in Modern Society, ISSA-Section Machine and System Safety, Mannheim, Germany, published by Springer Science + Business Media B.V. 2008 Go to original source...
  8. Safety of Machinery; a Guide to European Legislation and Standards for Manufacturers, Dealers, Users and Others; by Beuth Verlag GmbH, 10772 Berlin, Germany
  9. Siegfried Radandt; System Safety; Principles for MACHINERY- and SYSTEM SAFETY, Presentation at NEU Shenyang, China
  10. ISO 11161 Safety of machinery - Integrated manufacturing systems
  11. Bardach E (1996); Thinking for Deliberative Risk Communication. Risk Analysis 21(6), 1065-1076.
  12. Behn RD, Vaupel JV (1982) Quick Analysis for Busy Decision Makers. Basic,New York.
  13. De-Marchi B, Ravetz JR (1999) Risk Management and Governance: A Post-Normal Science Approach. Futures 31, 743-757. Go to original source...
  14. Cross FB (1996) Paradoxical Perils of the Precautionary Principle. Washington and Lee Law Review 53, 851-925.
  15. Assessment and Management of Chemical Risks. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, pp. 97-112.
  16. Morgan G, Henrion M (1992) Uncertainty: A Guide to Dealing with Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk and Policy Analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.