Acta Mechanica Slovaca 2024, 28(2):44-50 | DOI: 10.21496/ams.2024.016

Metamaterials and Their Application in Biomedical Engineering

Barbara Schürger1, Peter Frankovský1, Ingrid Delyová1, Jozef Živčák2, Sára Janigová1
1 Technical University of Košice, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Department of Applied Mechanics and Mechanical Engineering, Letná 9, 042 00 Košice, Slovak Republic
2 Technical University of Košice, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Department of Biomedical Engineering and Measurement, Letná 9, 042 00 Košice, Slovak Republic

Mechanical metamaterials have attracted attention due to their unique mechanical properties, such as low weight, adjustable stiffness, and auxeticity, making them excellent candidates for biomedical engineering innovative applications such as bone implants, vascular stents, and other healthcare applications. In this review, we will focus on the mechanical properties and behavior of these materials under different conditions, focusing on their application in the field of biomedical engineering.

Keywords: mechanical metamaterials; biomedical engineering; innovations; healthcare; auxetic; implant; 3D printing

Received: April 30, 2024; Revised: June 10, 2024; Accepted: June 11, 2024; Published: June 14, 2024  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Schürger, B., Frankovský, P., Delyová, I., Živčák, J., & Janigová, S. (2024). Metamaterials and Their Application in Biomedical Engineering. Acta Mechanica Slovaca28(2), 44-50. doi: 10.21496/ams.2024.016
Download citation

References

  1. ] Greaves, N. et al (2011). Poisson's ratio and modern materials. Nature Materials, vol. 10, no. 11, p. 823-837. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat3134 Go to original source...
  2. ] Kumar, N. D. et al (2021). A Review on Metamaterials for Device Applications. Crystals, vol. 11, no. 5, p. 518. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst11050518 Go to original source...
  3. ] Singh, G. et al (2015). A Review of Metamaterials and its Applications. In International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology, vol. 19, no. 6, p. 305-310. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14445/22315381/IJETT-V19P254 Go to original source...
  4. ] Fan, J. et al (2021). A review of additive manufacturing of metamaterials and developing trends. MaterialsToday, vol. 50, p. 303-328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2021.04.019. Go to original source...
  5. ] Ma, C. et al (2022). Optically controlled and polarized sensitivity adjustable terahertz metamaterial absorber. Results in Optics, vol. 9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rio.2022.100326 Go to original source...
  6. ] Layman, M.C. et al (2023). Highly anisotropic elements for acoustic pentamode applications. Physical Review Letters, vol. 111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.024302 Go to original source...
  7. ] Gill, H.S (2021). Mechanical and structure properties of cellular auxetic materials. Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 37, p.3320-3323. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.09.123. Go to original source...
  8. ] Mazaev, A.V. et al (2020). Auxetics materials: classification, mechanical properties and applications. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/747/1/012008 Go to original source...
  9. ] Wallbanks, M et al (2021). On the design workflow of auxetic metamaterials for structural applications. Smart Materials and Structures, vol. 31, no. 2. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.1088/1361-665X/ac3f78 Go to original source...
  10. ] Zhu, Y. et al (2022). A novel monoclinic auxetic metamaterial with tunable mechanical properties. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, vol. 236. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2022.107750. Go to original source...
  11. ] Huo, Y. et al (2021). A Critical Review on the Design, Manufacturing and Assessment of the Bone Scaffold for Large Bone Defects. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, vol. 9, p.155-168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2021.753715 Go to original source...
  12. ] Kolken, H.M.A. et al (2021). Fatigue performance of auxetic meta-biomaterials. Acta Biomaterialia, vol. 126, p.511-523. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2021.03.015 Go to original source...
  13. ] Ghavidelnia, N. et al (2020). Development of porous implants with non-uniform mechanical properties distribution based on CT images. Applied Mathematical Modelling, vol. 83, p. 801-823. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2020.03.002 Go to original source...
  14. ] Kolken, H.M.A. et al (2018). Rationally designed meta-implants: a combination of auxetic and conventional meta-biomaterials. Materials Horizons, vol. 5, p. 28-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/C7MH00699C Go to original source...
  15. ] Yu, A. et al (2023). Additive manufacturing of multi-morphology graded titanium scaffolds for bone implant applications. Journal of Materials Science & Technology, vol. 139, p. 47-58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2022.07.035 Go to original source...
  16. ] Yao, Y. et al (2020). A novel auxetic structure based bone screw design: Tensile mechanical characterization and pullout fixation strength evaluation. Materials & Design,vol. 188, p. 264-271. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2019.108424 Go to original source...
  17. ] Wang, S.B. et al (2009). Des-γ-carboxy prothrombin stimulates human vascular endothelial cell growth and migration. Clinical and Experimental Metastasis, vol. 26, p. 469-477. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10585-009-9246-y Go to original source...
  18. ] Wan, T. et al (2022). Adoption of Novel Nano Bio-vascular Stent in Carotid Artery Stenosis Stent Intervention and Perioperative Nursing Analysis. Cellular and Molecular Biology, vol. 68, p. 114-121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14715/cmb/2022.68.3.14 Go to original source...
  19. ] Solis, D.M. et al (2022). 3D and 4D additive manufacturing techniques for vascular-like structures - A review. Bioprinting, vol. 25, p. 251-263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bprint.2021.e00182 Go to original source...
  20. ] Martz, E.O et al (2005). Design of an Artificial Intervertebral Disc Exhibiting a Negative Poisson's Ratio. Cellular Polymers, vol. 24, p. 127-138. DOI: ttps://doi.org/10.1177/02624893050240030 Go to original source...
  21. ] Maerz, T. et al (2013). Molecular and genetic advances in the regeneration of the intervertebral disc. Surgical Neurology International, vol. 4, p. 94-105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/2152-7806.109449 Go to original source...
  22. ] Tian, S.X. et al (2022). Analgesic effect of electro acupuncture on bone cancer pain in rat model: the role of peripheral P2X3 receptor. Purinergic Signalling, vol. 19, p. 13-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11302-022-09861-7 Go to original source...
  23. ] Sanami, M. et al (2014). Auxetic Materials for Sports Applications. Procedia Engineering, vol. 72, p. 453-458. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.06.079 Go to original source...
  24. ] Wang, Z. et al (2014). Auxetic materials and their potential applications in textiles. Textile Research Journal, vol. 84, p. 1600-1611. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.1177/0040517512449051 Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.