Acta Mechanica Slovaca 2022, 26(4):30-37 | DOI: 10.21496/ams.2022.015

Comparison of Dental Surgical Guides Created by Additive Manufacturing

Ąuboą Chromý1, Viktória Raj»úková1, Andrea Sinčák - Konečná2, Svetlana Rusnáková1, Radovan Hudák1
1 Technical University of Koąice, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Department of Biomedical Engineering and Measurement, Letná 1/9, Koąice
2 Pavol Jozef ©afárik University, Faculty of Medicine, Koąice

The presented work deals with the analysis and testing of surgical guidance systems in the dental field, which were created based on available software. When manufacturing dental guidance systems, it is important to consider factors such as the digitization process in the production process, design, selection of the most suitable material and method of implantation. Three types of surgical guidance systems were made by three different devices which work on the principle of additive technology and were closely analysed. Subsequently, the created surgical guidance systems were compared with Standard Triangle Language (STL) files in Gom Inspect software, to determine the accuracy of printed objects. In conclusion, it is important to note that the presented work is a pilot study, which is focused on the design of a methodology to produce surgical guides using 3D printing, taking into account shape accuracy.

Keywords: dental surgery, additive manufacturing, biocompatible materials, CBCT

Received: December 16, 2021; Revised: August 18, 2022; Accepted: August 23, 2022; Published: December 15, 2022  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Chromý, Ą., Raj»úková, V., Sinčák - Konečná, A., Rusnáková, S., & Hudák, R. (2022). Comparison of Dental Surgical Guides Created by Additive Manufacturing. Acta Mechanica Slovaca, 26(4), 30-37. doi: 10.21496/ams.2022.015
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Bornstein, M. M., Horner, K., Jacobs, R. Use of cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: currentconcepts, indications and limitations for clinical practice and research. Periodontol 2000. 2017;73(1):51-72. Go to original source...
    2. Braut, V., Bornstein, M. M., Kuchler, U., Buser, D. Bone dimensions in the posterior mandible: a retrospective radiographic study using cone beam computed tomography. Part 2-analysis of edentulous sites. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2014;34(5):639-47. Go to original source...
    3. Ludlow, J. B., Ivanovic, M. Comparative dosimetry of dental CBCT devices and 64-slice CT for oral and maxillofacial radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008;106(1):106-14. Go to original source...
    4. Schulze, R., Bruellmann, D. D., Roeder, F., d'Hoedt, B. Determination of projection geometry from quantitative assessment of the distortion of spherical references in single-view projection radiography. Med Phys. 2004;31(10):2849-54. Go to original source...
    5. Schulze, R., Heil, U., Gross, D., Bruellmann, D.D., Dranischnikow, E., Schwanecke, U., Schoemer, E. Artefacts in CBCT: a review. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2011;40(5):265-73. Go to original source...
    6. Zhao, X. Z., Xu, W. H., Tang, Z. H., Wu, M. J., Zhu, J., Chen, S. Accuracy of computer-guided implant surgery by a CAD/CAM and laser scanning technique. Chin J Dent Res. 2014;17(1):31-6.
    7. Huotilainen, E., Jaanimets, R., Valáąek, J., Marcián, P., Salmi, M., Tuomi, J., Mäkitie, A., Wolff, J. Inaccuracies in additive manufactured medical skull models caused by the DICOM to STL conversion process. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2014;42(5):e259-65. Go to original source...
    8. Maintz, J. B., Viergever, M. A. A survey of medical image registration. Med Image Anal. 1998;2(1):1-36. Go to original source...
    9. Flügge, T., Derksen, W., Te Poel, J., Hassan, B., Nelson, K., Wismeijer, D. Registration of cone beam computed tomography data and intraoral surface scans - a prerequisite for guided implant surgery with CAD/CAM drilling guides. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017;28(9):1113-8. Go to original source...
    10. Katsoulis, J., Pazera, P., Mericske-Stern, R. Prosthetically driven, computer-guided implant planning for the edentulous maxilla: a model study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2009;11(3):238-45. Go to original source...
    11. Behneke, A., Burwinkel, M., Behneke, N. Factors influencing transfer accuracy of cone beam CT-derived template-based implant placement. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23(4):416-23. Go to original source...
    12. Fortin, T., Isidori, M., Blanchet, E., Perriat, M., Bouchet, H., Coudert, J. L. An image-guided system-drilled surgical template and trephine guide pin to make treatment of completely edentulous patients easier: a clinical report on immediate loading. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2004;6(2):111-9. Go to original source...
    13. Abbo, B. Fixed complete denture using implants andcomputer-guided technology. Dent Today. 2009;28(6):88 90, 92-3.
    14. Vercruyssen, M., Coucke, W., Naert, I., Jacobs, R., Teughels, W., Quirynen, M. Depth and lateral deviations in guided implant surgery: an RCT comparing guided surgery with mental navigation or the use of a pilot-drill template. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26(11):1315-20. Go to original source...
    15. Vercruyssen, M., Fortin, T., Widmann, G., Jacobs, R., Quirynen, M. Different techniques of static/dynamic guided implant surgery: modalities and indications. Periodontol 2000. 2014;66(1):214-27. Go to original source...
    16. Widmann, G., Berggren, J. P., Fischer, B., Pichler-Dennhardt, A. R., Schullian, P., Bale, R., Puelacher, W. Accuracy of image-fusion Stereolithographic guides: mapping CT data with three-dimensional optical surface scanning. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015;17(Suppl 2):e736-44. Go to original source...
    17. Neugebauer, J., Kistler, F., Kistler, S., Züdorf, G., Freyer, D., Ritter, L., Dreiseidler, T., Kusch, J., Zöller, J.E. CAD/CAM-produced surgical guides: optimizing the treatment workflow. Int J Comput Dent. 2011;14(2):93-103.
    18. Bindl, A. Clinical application of fully digital Cerec surgical guides made in-house. Int J Comput Dent. 2015;18(2):163-75.
    19. Sarment, D. P., Sukovic, P., Clinthorne, N. Accuracy of implant placement with a stereolithographic surgical guide. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003;18(4):571-7.
    20. Gallucci, G. O., Evans, C., Tahmaseb, A. 2019. Digital Workflows in Implant Dentistry. Publisher Quintessence Publishing (IL). ISBN: 9783868674996
    21. Biocompatible 3D printing resins for medical applications: A review of marketed intended use, biocompatibility certification, and post-processing guidance. Annals of 3D Printed Medicine. Vol. 5, 2022. 100044.
    22. Surgical Guides Resins, from https://www.midasteknoloji.com/resins/surgical-guide-resin/?lang=en
    23. Alauddin, M. S., Baharuddin, A. S., Mohd Ghazali, M. I. The Modern and Digital Transformation of Oral Health Care: A Mini Review. Healthcare 2021, 9, 118. Go to original source...
    24. Katsoulis, J., Enkling, N., Takeichi, T., Urban, I. A., Mericske-Stern, R., Avrampou, M. Relative bone width of the edentulous maxillary ridge. Clinical implications of digital assessment in presurgical implant planning. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012;14(Suppl 1):e213-23. Go to original source...
    25. Turbush, S. K., Turkyilmaz, I. Accuracy of three different types of stereolithographic surgical guide in implant placement: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 2012;108(3):181-8. Go to original source...
    26. Raico Gallardo, Y. N., da Silva-Olivio, I. R. T., Mukai, E., Morimoto, S., Sesma, N., Cordaro, L. Accuracy comparison of guided surgery for dental implants according to the tissue of support: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin OralImplants Res. 2017;28(5):602-12. Go to original source...
    27. Cassetta, M., Di Mambro, A., Giansanti, M., Stefanelli, L. V., Cavallini, C. The intrinsic error of a stereolithographic surgical template in implant guided surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013;42(2):264-75. Go to original source...
    28. Tahmaseb, A., Wu, V., Wismeijer, D., Coucke, W., Evans, C. The accuracy of static computer-aided implant surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018;29(Suppl 16):416-35. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content