Acta Mechanica Slovaca 2017, 21(4):52-59 | DOI: 10.21496/ams.2017.037

A Methodology for Assessing the Quality of Working Environment: Example of Research Proposal

Miriama Piňosová1,*, Miriam Andrejiová2
1 Technical University of Košice, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Department of Process and Environmental Engineering, Park Komenského 5, Košice, Slovakia
2 Technical University of Košice, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Department of Applied Mathematics and Informatics, Letná 9, Košice, Slovakia

Objectives: This contribution is devoted to the experimental proposal of the methodology for a comprehensive assessment of the working environment quality.

Methods: The evaluation was based on a basic assumption that the human organism during its work on different jobs affects various risk factors. We assume an ideal working environment with optimal or "zero" values of operating factors. Before determining the appropriate method of evaluation is appropriate to combine qualitative and quantitative assessment, creating a system for evaluating the parameters of the working environment that reflects: the nature of the impact parameters of the working environment, duration of effect, simultaneously operating range of risk factors and magnitude of the impact of individual parameters of the working environment.

Results: The evaluation process in this case, enters workplace factors: noise, vibration, lighting, dust, electromagnetic fields, radiant heat and ergonomics, stress and safety factors. The most important step is the selection and evaluation that will be based on an evaluation of information and also interviewed people from expert's evaluation. The experiment was focused on four basic physical factors (noise, vibration, dust and lighting) working environment, which are among the most risky in terms of assessing the health of employees and duration of exposure in the workplace during their work shift.

Conclusions: Computation of the final evaluation factor level work environment in workplace is real work load value equal to J = 0.5027. In the final step of the proposed methodology based on point spread, we concluded that the risk is insignificant, the system is safe. The methodology presented in this paper describes the authors' idea about how to resolve this issue. The presented results are based on past experience in the field of measurement and evaluation of environmental factors, the authors actually perform.

Keywords: Saaty methods, risk assessment, comprehensive assessment, experimental proposal

Published: October 31, 2017  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Piňosová, M., & Andrejiová, M. (2017). A Methodology for Assessing the Quality of Working Environment: Example of Research Proposal. Acta Mechanica Slovaca21(4), 52-59. doi: 10.21496/ams.2017.037
Download citation

References

  1. Dado, M., Hudecová, D., Hnilica, R. (2012) Combined effects of lighting, noise and temperature on work performance. Acta Universitatis Matthiae Belii. Vol. 14, No. 1, p. 100-104.
  2. Drake, P.R. (1998) Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process in Engineering Education. Int. J. Engng. Ed. Vol. 14, No.3, p.191-196.
  3. Hnilica R. (2011) Development of framework for assessment of combined effects of risk factors. In: Acta Facultatis Technicae. XVI. 2011 (2): 31-37.
  4. Lumnitzer, E., Badida, M., Romanová, M. (2007) Hodnotenie kvality prostredia. p. 25-68.
  5. Lumnitzer, E., et al. (2013) Methodology of complex health risk assessment in industry 2. Publishers MUSKA sp. z o.o. Poland. p. 326.
  6. Millet, I., Wedley, W.C. (2002) Modelling Risk and Uncertainty with the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 11: 97-107. Go to original source...
  7. Piňosová, M., Andrejiová, M., Lumnitzer, E. (2012) Analyzing clinical symptoms of the synergy of high exposure to noise and vibration on human health in productions. Pracovní lékařství. Vol. 64, No. 2-3. p. 103-111.
  8. Robson, M., Toscano, W. (2007) Risk Assessment for Environmental Health 1-611.
  9. Roháčová, I., Marková, Z. (2009) The Analysis of AHP method and its potential use in logistics. Acta Montanistica Slovaca. Ročník 14. (1) 103-112.
  10. Saaty, T. L. (2008) Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, vol. 1, p. 83-98. Go to original source...
  11. Šubrt, T. et al. (2011) Economic and mathematical methods. Cenek, Plzeň.
  12. Vargas, L.G. (1990) An overview of the analytic hierarchy process and its applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 48: 2-8. 1990. Go to original source...
  13. Zimmermann H.J. (2000) Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods: A Comparative Study.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.