Acta Mechanica Slovaca 2013, 17(3):94-97 | DOI: 10.21496/ams.2013.038

Method Comparison of the Evaluation of the Cylindricity Deviation Measured by Different Measurement Strategies

Miroslav Dovica1*, Ján Buša2
1 Department of Biomedical Engineering and Measurement, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering. Letná 9, 04200 Košice, Slovak Republic
2 Department of Mathematics and Theoretical Informatics, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Informatics, Technical University of Košice, Němcovej 32, 040 01 Košice, Slovak Republic

The aim of this paper is to compare the quantitative parameters of methods used for the evaluation of the cylindricity deviation. Data is measured by the contact method using three different strategies for cylindricity measurement on the coordinate measurement machine (CMM) Contura G2, Carl Zeiss. For particular measurement strategies, the data is evaluated by Calypso 5.0 software (CMM) Contura G2 and Matlab/Octave software. In order to compare the collected data, we use the parameters of possible axes positions of two coaxial cylinders and their least radial distance. In the last part of this paper, there is the discussion regarding obtained parameters of evaluating methods.

Keywords: Cylindricity deviation, measurement strategy, linear least squares method (LLS), coordinate measuring machine (CMM)

Published: October 31, 2013  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Dovica, M., & Buša, J. (2013). Method Comparison of the Evaluation of the Cylindricity Deviation Measured by Different Measurement Strategies. Acta Mechanica Slovaca, 17(3), 94-97. doi: 10.21496/ams.2013.038
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Flag D.: CMM measurement strategies. ISSN 1368-6550 NPL United Kingdom 2001.
    2. Henzold G.: Geometrical Dimensioning and Tolerancing for Design, Manufacturing and Inspection. Elsevier Ltd. 2006
    3. ISO 12180-2:1999: Geometrical product specification (GPS) Cylindricity - Part 2: Specification operators.- Berlin: Beuth Verlag GmbH, 1999, 15 pp.
    4. Adamczak S.: Metrologia w budowie maszyn. Warszawa, Wydawnictwa Naukowo- techniczne, 2004,300 s. ISBN 978-83-204-3526-9
    5. Majstrovič V., Hodolič J.: Numerički upravljane merne mašine. Novi Sad, Offset print, 1998, 183 s. ISBN 86-499-0091-7
    6. Chudý V., Palenčár R., Kureková E., Halaj M.: Meranie technických veličín. Vyd. STU, 1998 ISBN 80-227-1171-3
    7. Ákos A. Model of electronic moire equipment. Inf. Control. Syst. 2010;9:36-68.
    8. Adamczak S., Janecki D., Makiela W., Stepieň K.: Quantitative comparison of cylindricity profiles measured with different methods using legendre-fourier coefficients Metrol.Meas.Syst. Vol.XVII (2010), No.3.pp.397-404 Go to original source...
    9. Довица М., Буша Я., Паленчар Р., Дюриш C., Шоош Л., Врба И., Шковранек Т., Келеменова Т.: Cравнение методов анализа отклонений круглости. Измерительная техника. 2013, №9, C. 25-27.(in Russian)

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content