Acta Mechanica Slovaca 2016, 20(1):10-13 | DOI: 10.21496/ams.2016.002

Hole Making of Inconel 718 Aerospace Alloy

Marek Vrabeľ1,*, Martin Eckstein2
1 Technical University of Košice, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Department of Manufacturing Technology and Materials, Mäsiarska 74, 040 01 Košice, Slovak Republic
2 MTU AeroEngines Munich, Dachauer Strasse 665, 809905 Munich, Germany

Different surface integrity parameters have become one of the major interest within aero engine components production in the aerospace industry. Hole making process of nickel based super alloy Inconel 718 consists of two machining operations, where drilling is applied to remove stock material and is followed by reaming to meet required quality as well as tolerances of the component prescribed by drawing. In the present work, surface roughness parameters Ra and Rz in terms of machined surface integrity were investigated. Their evaluation was performed with respect to number of machined holes and type of employed cutting tool. The results indicate that use of face-cutting finishers produced holes with lower surface roughness when compared to twist drills. Special attention was paid to ensure that the cutting conditions correspond to the industrial practice. Both cutting tools used in experiments were ground from tungsten carbide.

Keywords: hole making; aerospace industry; surface roughness; Inconel 718; tungsten carbide

Published: March 31, 2016  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Vrabeľ, M., & Eckstein, M. (2016). Hole Making of Inconel 718 Aerospace Alloy. Acta Mechanica Slovaca20(1), 10-13. doi: 10.21496/ams.2016.002
Download citation

References

  1. Jawahir, I. S., Brinksmeier, E., M'Saoubi, R., Aspinwall, D. K., Outeiro, J. C., Meyer, D. (2011). Surface Integrity in Material Removal Processes: Recent Advances. Annals of the CIRP, 60, 2, 603-626. Go to original source...
  2. M'Saoubi, R., Axinte, D., Herbert, Ch., Hardy, M., Salmon, P. (2014). Surface integrity of nickel-based alloys subjected to severe plastic deformation by abusive drilling. CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology, 63, 61-64. Go to original source...
  3. Ezugwu, E. O., Bonney, J., Yamane, Y. (2003). An overview of the machinability of aero - engine alloys, Journal of Material Processing Technology, 134, 233-235. Go to original source...
  4. Rivero, A., Aramendi, G., Herraz, S., Lopez de Lacalle, L. N. (2006). An experimental investigation of the effect of coatings and cutting parameters on the dry drilling performance of aluminium alloys. Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 28, 1-11. Go to original source...
  5. Durul, M., Tugrul, O. (2011). Machining induced surface integrity in titanium and nickel alloys: A review. International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 51, 250-280. Go to original source...
  6. Che-Haron, A., Jawaid, A. (2005). The effect of machining on surface integrity of titanium. Journal of Material Processing Technology, 166, 188-192. Go to original source...
  7. Che-Haron, A. (2001). Tool life and surface integrity in turning titanium alloy. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 118, 231-237. Go to original source...
  8. Engine Alliance, http://www.enginealliance.com/gp7200.html,12.03.2016.
  9. Arrazola, J. P. (2001). ACCENT Project - Adaptive Control of Manufacturing Processes for a New Generation of Jet Engine Components, Deliverable 3.1 Sensor system definition
  10. Thakur, A., Gangopadhyay, S. (2016). State-of-the-art in surface integrity in machining of nickel-based super alloys. International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 100, 25-54. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.